La Biblioteca digitale del Pubblico ministero
aggiornamento: 10 maggio 2011
Presentazione della Biblioteca digitale del Pubblico ministero
Negli ultimi anni il ruolo e le funzioni del Pubblico Ministero quale “organo di giustizia” sono stati oggetto di un crescente interesse degli addetti, degli studiosi e della giurisprudenza.
Il Comitato dei Ministri del Consiglio d’Europa, il Consiglio consultivo dei procuratori europei, la Commissione di Venezia, le Nazioni Unite, la stessa Unione Europea, hanno elaborato testi, pareri e raccomandazioni che delineano gli elementi di uno “statuto minimo comune” dei Pubblici Ministeri (e tra essi dei Procuratori generali) nei sistemi di giustizia nazionali.
Le stesse Corti internazionali (Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo, Corte di giustizia dell’UE) hanno nella loro giurisprudenza affrontato alcune questioni di grande importanza in questa materia.
In vista della Conferenza di Roma del 26-28 maggio 2011, abbiamo raccolto questi testi e questi materiali. Essi saranno periodicamente aggiornati con l’ambizione di costituire una “Biblioteca digitale del Pubblico ministero” in Europa e non solo.
Ogni contributo sarà il benvenuto. Per comunicazioni al riguardo si potrà utilizzare l’indirizzo e-mail dell’Ufficio per gli affari interni e internazionali della Procura generale presso la Corte di cassazione: ua.internazionali.pg.cassazione@giustizia.it
Indice:
Testi e documenti
Giurisprudenza CEDU
1. Consiglio d'Europa
- Comitato dei Ministri
- Raccomandazione Rec(2000)19 del Comitato dei ministri agli Stati membri sul ruolo del pubblico ministero nell'ordinamento penale
- Raccomandazione Rec(2000)19 del Comitato dei ministri agli Stati membri sul ruolo del pubblico ministero nell'ordinamento penale
- Consiglio Consultivo dei Procuratori Europei (CCPE)
- Terms of Reference 2011 (As approved at the 1099th meeting of the Minister Deputies, 23 November 2010)
Mandat du CCPE pour 2011 (Tel qu'approuvé par les Délégués des Ministres lors de leur 1099e réunion, 23 novembre 2010) - Framework overall action plan for the work of the CCPE
Programme cadre d'action général pour les travaux du CCPE - Memorandum on the visibility of the work of the CCPE, on dissemination and implementation of the CCPE Opinions
Mémorandum sur la visibilité des travaux du CCPE, la dissémination et la mise en œuvre des Avis du CCPE - Opinion 1 (2007): Ways of improving international co-operation in the criminal justice field
Avis 1 (2007) : Les moyens d’améliorer la coopération internationale dans le domaine pénal - Opinion 2 (2008): Alternatives to prosecution
Avis 2 (2008) : Les mesures alternatives aux poursuites - Opinion 3 (2008): The role of prosecution services outside the criminal law field
Avis 3 (2008) : Le rôle du ministère public en dehors du systhème de la justice pénale - Opinione 4 (2009): Giudici e magistrati del pubblico ministero in una società democratica. Dichiarazione di Bordeaux
- Opinion 5 (2010): Public prosecution and juvenile justice. Yerevan declaration
Avis 5 (2010) : Le ministère public et la justice des mineurs. Declaration de Erevan
- Terms of Reference 2011 (As approved at the 1099th meeting of the Minister Deputies, 23 November 2010)
- Conferenza dei Procuratori Generali Europei (CPGE)
- Inaugural conference: What public prosecution in Europe in the XXIst Century (Strasbourg, 2000)
Conférence inaugurale : Quel ministère public en Europe au XXIè siècle (Strasbourg, 2000) - First conference: Protecting society from organised crime (Caserta, 2000)
Première conférence : La défense de la société à l’égard de la criminalité organisée (Caserta, 2000) - Second conference: Harmonisation and co-operation between prosecutors at European level (Bucharest, 2001)
Deuxième conférence : L’harmonisation et la coopération des ministères publics à l’échelle européenne (Bucarest, 2001) - Third conference: 3rd Conference of Prosecutors General of Europe (Ljubljana, 2002)
Troisième conférence : 3ème Conférence des Procureurs Généraux d’Europe (Ljubljana, 2002) - Fourth conference: Public prosecution and politics (Bratislava, 2003)
Quatrième conférence : Ministère Public et politique (Bratislava, 2003) - Fifth conference: Discretionary powers of public prosecution: opportunity or legal principle – advantages and disadvantages (Celle, 2004)
Cinquième conférence : Les pouvoirs d’appréciation du Ministère Public : le principe d’opportunité ou de légalité, avantages et inconvénients (Celle, 2004) - Sixth conference: The relationships between public prosecutors and the police (Budapest, 2005)
Sixième conférence : Les rapports entre le ministère public et la police (Budapest, 2005) - The Budapest Guidelines: European guidelines on ethics and conduct for public prosecutors (Budapest, 2005)
Les lignes directrices de Budapest : Lignes directrices européennes sur l'éthique et la conduite des membres du Ministère public (Budapest, 2005) - Seventh conference: The role of the public prosecutor in the protection of individuals (Moscow, 2006)
Septième conférence : Le rôle du ministère public dans la protection des individus (Moscou, 2006) - Warsaw conference: Ways to improve international co-operation in the criminal justice field (Warsaw, 2007)
Varsovie conférence : Moyens d'ameliorer la coopération internationale dans le domaine pénal (Varsovie, 2007) - Eigth conference: The role of the public prosecutor in the protection of human rights and public interest outside the criminal law field (Saint Petersburg, 2008)
Huitième conférence : Le rôle du Ministère public dans la protection des droits de l’Homme et de l’intérêt général en dehors du domaine pénal (Saint Petersburg, 2008)
- Inaugural conference: What public prosecution in Europe in the XXIst Century (Strasbourg, 2000)
- Commissione di Venezia
- Report on european standards as regards the independence of the judicial system: part II – The prosecution service. Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 85th plenary session (Venice, 2010)
Rapport sur les normes européennes relatives à l'indépendance du système judiciaire : partie II – Le minstère public. Adopté par la Commission de Venise lors de sa 85e session plénière (Venise, 2010)
- Report on european standards as regards the independence of the judicial system: part II – The prosecution service. Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 85th plenary session (Venice, 2010)
2. Nazioni Unite
- Guidelines on the Role of Prosecutors: Adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba, 27 August to 7 September 1990
- ICC Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
ICC Statut de Rome de la Cour pénale internationale - ICC Regulations of the Office of the Prosecutor
ICC Règlement du Bureau du Procureur - Statute of Tribunal for Yugoslavia: Updated statute of the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (art. 16, 18, 19, 25, 26, 30)
- Statute of Tribunal for Rwanda: Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States, between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1994 (art 15)
- Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone (art. 15)
3. Unione Europea
- Versione consolidata del trattato sull'Unione europea e del trattato sul funzionamento dell'Unione europea (art. 86)
- Decisione del Consiglio 2002/187/GAI del 28 febbraio 2002 che istituisce l'Eurojust per rafforzare la lotta contro le forme gravi di criminalità
- Decisione del Consiglio relativa al rafforzamento di Eurojust e che modifica la decisione 2002/187/GAI del Consiglio che istituisce Eurojust per rafforzare la lotta contro le forme gravi di criminalità
-
23/11/2010
Affaire Moulin c. France : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 53-62
-
29/03/2010
Case of Medvedyev and others v. France: Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) §§ 123-124
Affaire Medvedyev et autres c. France : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 123-124 -
26/05/2009
Case of Batsanina v. Russia: Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) §§ 15-17, 20-28
Affaire Batsanina c. Russie : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 15-17, 20-28 -
12/02/2008
Case of Guja v. Moldova: Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) §§ 85-91
Affaire Guja c. Moldova : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 85-91 -
08/01/2008
Affaire Saygili et autres c. Turquie : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 34-40 -
26/07/2007
Affaire Dumitru Popescu c. Roumanie (n° 2) : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 68-86 -
26/07/2007
Affaire Dumitru Popescu c. Roumanie (n° 1) : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 70-79 -
12/04/2006
Case of Martinie v. France : Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) §§ 50-55
Affaire Martinie c. France : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 50-55 -
10/11/2005
Case of Ramsahai and others v. The Netherlands: Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) §§ 321-357
Affaire Ramsahai et autres c. Pays-Bas : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 321-357 -
08/07/2003
Affaire Fontaine et Bertin c. France : Arrêt (Au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 57-67 -
03/06/2003
Case of Pantea v. Romania: Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) §§ 232-243
Affaire Pantea c. Roumanie : Arrêt (Au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 232-243 -
11/03/2003
Case of Lesnik v. Slovakia: Judgment (Merits) § 54
Affaire Lesnik c. Slovaquie : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) § 54 -
20/07/2000
Case of Caloc v. France: Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) §§ 87-92
Affaire Caloc c. France : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 87-92 -
04/07/2000
Case of Niedbala v. Poland: Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) §§ 48-57
-
8/10/1998
Case of Assenov and others v. Bulgaria: Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) § 146
Affaire Assenov et autres c. Bulgarie : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) § 146
-
20/02/1996
Case of Lobo Machado v. Portugal: Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) §§ 24-32
Affaire Lobo Machado c. Portugal : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 24-32 -
30/10/1991
Case of Borgers v. Belgium: Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) §§ 24-29
Affaire Borgers c. Belgique : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 24-29 -
22/05/1984
Case of De Jong, Baljet and Van Den Brink v. The Netherlands: Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) §§ 49-50
Affaire De Jong, Baljet et Van Den Brink c. Pays-Bas : Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) §§ 49-50 -
01/10/1982
Case of Piersack v. Belgium: Judgment (Merits) §§ 30-32
Affaire Piersack c. Belgique : Arrêt (au principal) §§ 30-32 -
04/12/1979
Case of Schiesser v. Switzerland: Judgment (Merits) §§ 27-29
Affaire Schiesser c. Suisse : Arrêt (au principal) §§ 27-29
(ultimo aggiornamento, 18 maggio 2011)